CMS Pixel Detector Miscellaneous
Phase 1 Phase 2
Layer 1 Replacement Layers 2-4
  Layer 1 Replacement Elog  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Fri Mar 27 18:29:53 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1629, M1630, M1631, M1632 
    Reply  Mon Mar 30 14:52:59 2020, Danek Kotlinski, Full test, FT of M1629, M1630, M1631, M1632 m1630_roc1_ph_fits.png
    Reply  Mon Mar 30 15:40:52 2020, Urs, Full test, FT of M1629, M1630, M1631, M1632 phval-curve_M1630_p10_C1.pdfphshot_vcal255.pdfpixelalive_C1.pdf
Message ID: 156     Entry time: Mon Mar 30 14:52:59 2020     In reply to: 154
Author: Danek Kotlinski 
Category: Full test 
Subject: FT of M1629, M1630, M1631, M1632 
I have tested M1630.
I see not problem with ROC1. See the attached plot.
There is one dcol in ROC12 which shoes the "pattern" problem seen in a few other ROCs.
I think this module is fine, should be B. Could be retested.
Attachment 1: m1630_roc1_ph_fits.png  13 kB  Uploaded Mon Mar 30 15:55:18 2020  | Hide | Hide all
m1630_roc1_ph_fits.png
ELOG V3.1.3-7933898