CMS Pixel Detector
Miscellaneous
|
Phase 1
Phase 2
|
Layer 1 Replacement
Layers 2-4
|
Layer 1 Replacement Elog |
Not logged in |
|
|
Thu Apr 30 16:47:00 2020, Matej Roguljic, Software, MoReWeb empty DAC plots
|
Thu Apr 30 17:24:57 2020, Dinko Ferencek, Software, MoReWeb empty DAC plots
|
Thu Apr 30 17:33:04 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Software, MoReWeb empty DAC plots
|
Thu May 7 00:10:15 2020, Dinko Ferencek, Software, MoReWeb empty DAC plots
|
|
Message ID: 245
Entry time: Thu Apr 30 17:33:04 2020
In reply to: 243
Reply to this: 253
|
Author: |
Andrey Starodumov |
Category: |
Software |
Subject: |
MoReWeb empty DAC plots |
|
|
Matej Roguljic wrote: | Some of the DAC parameters plots were empty in the total production overview page. All the empty plots had the number "35" in them (e.g. DAC distribution m20_1 vana 35). The problem was tracked down to the trimming configuration. Moreweb was expecting us to trim to Vcal 35, while we decided to trim to Vcal 50. I "grepped" where this was hardcoded and changed 35->50.
The places where I made changes:
- Analyse/AbstractClasses/TestResultEnvironment.py
'trimThr':35
- Analyse/Configuration/GradingParameters.cfg.default
trimThr = 35
- Analyse/OverviewClasses/CMSPixel/ProductionOverview/ProductionOverviewPage/ProductionOverviewPage.py
TrimThresholds = ['', '35']
- Analyse/OverviewClasses/CMSPixel/ProductionOverview/ProductionOverviewPage/ProductionOverviewPage.py
self.SubPages.append({"InitialAttributes" : {"Anchor": "DACDSpread35", "Title": "DAC parameter spread per module - 35"}, "Key": "Section","Module": "Section"})
It's interesting to note that someone had already made the change in "Analyse/Configuration/GradingParameters.cfg" |
I have changed
1)StandardVcal2ElectronConversionFactorfrom 50 to 44 for VCal calibration of PROC600V4 is 44el/VCal
2)TrimBitDifference from 2 to -2 for not to take into account failed trim bit test that is an artifact from trimbit test SW. |