| ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
|
201
|
Wed Apr 8 17:17:13 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1662 failed |
| Andrey Starodumov wrote: | Address decoding of M1662 failed in one double column of ROC4.
To be decided what to do with this module.
Currently in C* tray. |
With CtrlReg=17 the grade of module is B. Still in one double column "noisy" pixels: with hits from other 3 pixels of a cluster.
Stay in C* tray. To come back later. |
|
188
|
Mon Apr 6 14:52:09 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1657 failed |
No hits in ROC14 and ROC15.
Here is an error:
"ERROR: <datapipe.cc/CheckEventValidity:L524> Channel 5 Number of ROCs (1) != Token Chain Length (2)"
To module doctor! |
|
179
|
Fri Apr 3 14:18:15 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1651 on April 2 |
Due to damaged module adapter the first Reception test failed and after MoreWeb analysis graded C.
After second Reception test (with proper connected cable) the grade is A.
To keep grade A instead of C in the MoreWeb summary table I removed the directory of the first Reception:
:~/L1_DATA/M1651_Reception_2020-04-02_16h09m_1585836596 (but the .tar file is still there), run python Controller.py -d (and remove raw with C grade from GlobalFinalResult) and rerun python Controller.py -m M1651 |
|
204
|
Thu Apr 9 14:49:07 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1650 failed |
Module has been tested on April 2nd.
Under Molex connector in ROC12 471 dead or noisy pixels.
Grade C. |
|
165
|
Tue Mar 31 17:32:47 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1641-M1644 |
| All modules graded A. |
|
160
|
Mon Mar 30 17:49:31 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1637-1640 |
All modules: M1637, M1638, M1639, M1649, are graded A.
|
|
144
|
Thu Mar 26 17:41:52 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1629-1632 |
| All modules M1629, M1630, M1631 and M1632 graded A |
|
136
|
Wed Mar 25 14:44:37 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1627 and M1628 |
| Both modules graded A. |
|
196
|
Wed Apr 8 13:40:45 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1625 failed |
Silvan substituted TBM on this module.
Now ROC0 does not have hits.
Grade C, goes to "Bad" tray. |
|
209
|
Tue Apr 14 15:49:05 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1623, M1657, M1673, M1674 |
M1623: Grade A, should be B due to 71 bump defects in ROC4
M1657: Grade B, due to 51 dead pixels in ROC12
M1673: Grade A, again 31 dead bumps in ROC12
M1674: Grade A, again 39 dead bumps in ROC12 |
|
197
|
Wed Apr 8 13:43:15 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1623 failed |
M1623: all ROCs are programmable but no readout from ROC8-ROC11.
Visual inspection is OK.
To module doctor. |
|
133
|
Wed Mar 25 14:11:35 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1613 and M1614 on Mar 20 |
Reception test for these modules have been done on Mar20.
Grading A for both modules. |
|
187
|
Mon Apr 6 14:42:43 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1575 failed |
Silvan has substituted the TBM0 of M1575.
Still no hits in ROC0-ROC3: "NO DATA" "IDLE DATA" warnings
The long cable has been attached.
To module doctor! |
|
191
|
Tue Apr 7 14:26:48 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1567 failed |
After exchange of TBM1 the results is the same:
WAS:
1567: Grade C, no data from ROCs 8-11, looks like a problem with one TBM1 core
NOW:
-during ThrComp-CalDel scan: WARNING: Detected DESER400 trailer error bits: "IDLE DATA"
- result: INFO: CalDel: 135 134 126 121 158 141 119 133 _ 124 _ 107 _ 126 _ 108 133 91 138 120
ROC8-ROC11 no hits! |
|
166
|
Tue Mar 31 17:33:37 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1546 |
This is a module with a broken TBM. Silvan put a new one on top of the broken TBM.
The module is graded A after reception test.
I'm still not sure that wire-bonds of the new TBM is lower than capacitors. I'll try to glue a cap tomorrow
to see whether we could substitute TBMs on another 6 modules with broken TBMs. |
|
171
|
Wed Apr 1 15:32:43 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1546 |
| Andrey Starodumov wrote: | This is a module with a broken TBM. Silvan put a new one on top of the broken TBM.
The module is graded A after reception test.
I'm still not sure that wire-bonds of the new TBM is lower than capacitors. I'll try to glue a cap tomorrow
to see whether we could substitute TBMs on another 6 modules with broken TBMs. |
Cap has been glued to M1546. No damaged wire-bonds. Vthr-CalDel and PixelAlive are OK.
Module to be (FT) tested tomorrow. |
|
195
|
Tue Apr 7 18:02:07 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of 1654 |
After Silvan removed a cap and re-bonded broken and bent wires M1654 again has been tested.
RT grade is A.
Protection cap to be glued and to be (F)tested. |
|
83
|
Thu Feb 13 21:44:28 2020 |
Dinko Ferencek | Reception test | RT for 6 modules: 1573, 1574, 1575, 1576, 1577, 1578 |
1573: Grade A
1574: Grade B, I(150)/I(100) > 2 (4.63)
1575: Grade C, problem with one TBM core
1576: Grade A
1577: Grade A
1578: Grade A |
|
78
|
Tue Feb 11 10:25:32 2020 |
Dinko Ferencek | Reception test | RT for 6 modules: 1563, 1564, 1565, 1566, 1567, 1568 |
Feb. 10
1563: Grade C, ROCs 8 and 10 not programmable, no obvious problems with wire bonds
1564: Grade B, I > 2 uA (2.17 uA)
Feb. 11
1565: Grade A
1566: Grade A
1567: Grade C, no data from ROCs 8-11, looks like a problem with one TBM1 core
1568: Grade A |
|
71
|
Fri Feb 7 19:40:27 2020 |
Dinko Ferencek | Reception test | RT for 6 modules: 1557, 1558, 1559, 1560, 1561, 1562 |
Reception test is done and all 6 modules were graded A.
Protective caps were glued to 4 modules: 1557, 1558, 1559, 1560 |