| ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
91
|
Thu Feb 27 09:47:51 2020 |
Urs Langenegger | Full test | Fulltest on 2020/02/26 | On Wednesday, 2020/02/26 the following modules
went through the full qualification procedure:
|
|
|
93
|
Fri Feb 28 17:33:16 2020 |
Urs Langenegger | Full test | Fulltests on 2020/02/28 | M1589 B
M1590 C (gain issues?)
M1591 C (noise issues?)
|
|
|
94
|
Mon Mar 2 17:39:36 2020 |
Urs Langenegger | Full test | Fulltests on 2020/03/02 | Modules tested:
M1595 C
M1596 B
|
|
|
96
|
Wed Mar 4 11:32:42 2020 |
danek kotlinski | Full test | change the target trim threshodl to vcal=50 | After some discussion we decided to change
the target trimming threshold from vcal 40
to 50.
|
|
|
105
|
Thu Mar 12 17:21:59 2020 |
Matej Roguljic | Full test | Fulltests on 2020/03/12 | Modules tested:
M1557 C (trim bits at -20)
M1558 C (gain at -20)
|
|
|
107
|
Sat Mar 14 17:08:14 2020 |
Matej Roguljic | Full test | Fulltests on 2020/03/13 |
Modules tested:
M1591 C (gain at -20)
|
|
|
115
|
Wed Mar 18 17:46:07 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1601-M1604 | M1601-M1604 passed full test
M1601: grade B
M1602-M1604: Grade C. The main reason is |
|
|
117
|
Thu Mar 19 18:01:50 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1605-M1608 | Only M1607 graded B. All others are graded
C due to trimbit test.
M1606 should be looked carefully and may |
|
|
122
|
Fri Mar 20 18:32:34 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1609-M1612 | M1609 and M1611 are graded C
M1610 and M1612 are graded B
|
|
|
131
|
Tue Mar 24 18:09:07 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1615, M1619, M1620, M1622 | Test results have been analysed with modified
code:
M1615: B
|
|
|
134
|
Wed Mar 25 14:17:51 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1609, M1613, M1614, M1618 on Mar 23 | FT for these modules has been done on Mar
23
M1609: C
|
|
|
137
|
Wed Mar 25 17:03:11 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1615, M1619, M1620, M1622 | [quote="Andrey Starodumov"]Test results have
been analysed with modified code:
M1615: B
|
|
|
140
|
Wed Mar 25 18:40:53 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1599, M1613, M1624, M1616 | M1599: B due to leakage current at +10 (2-3umA)
M1613: B due to a few pixels with bad trimmed
threshold
|
|
|
146
|
Thu Mar 26 17:45:15 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1545, M1557, M1627, M1628 | Retested M1545: C->B (to be correct on the
MoreWeb summary page)
Retested 1557: C->C in one ROC >160 pixels |
|
|
147
|
Fri Mar 27 10:54:04 2020 |
Urs Langenegger | Full test | Issues with pc11366 on March 27 | On March 27 I had a lot of troubles getting
the full qualification up
and running.
|
|
|
153
|
Fri Mar 27 18:28:34 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | 4 HDIs tested | HDIs 5020, 5018, 1044 and 1041 are OK |
|
|
154
|
Fri Mar 27 18:29:53 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1629, M1630, M1631, M1632 | M1629: B due to mean noise at -20C
M1630: C due to ROC1 with all pixels failed
of PH calibration (Gain). Both FT at -20C |
|
|
156
|
Mon Mar 30 14:52:59 2020 |
Danek Kotlinski | Full test | FT of M1629, M1630, M1631, M1632 | I have tested M1630.
I see not problem with ROC1. See the attached
plot.
|
|
|
157
|
Mon Mar 30 15:40:52 2020 |
Urs | Full test | FT of M1629, M1630, M1631, M1632 | M1630 is interesting because (I am using my
terminology in the following) for the test
at T=+10C ROC1 fails the PH optimization |
|
|
162
|
Tue Mar 31 08:21:39 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of 1558, 1606, 1634, 1636 on Mar 30 | M1558: B
M1606: C again due to trimmed threshold for
189 pixels of ROC2 at -20C. Second time at |
|