ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
152
|
Fri Mar 27 17:27:09 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | M1635 failed Reception |
All ROCs are programmable but DESER400 trailer error bits: "NO DATA" or "IDLE DATA".
ROC8-11 are affected (no data)
Visual inspection is OK
To module doctor |
160
|
Mon Mar 30 17:49:31 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1637-1640 |
All modules: M1637, M1638, M1639, M1649, are graded A.
|
165
|
Tue Mar 31 17:32:47 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1641-M1644 |
All modules graded A. |
166
|
Tue Mar 31 17:33:37 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1546 |
This is a module with a broken TBM. Silvan put a new one on top of the broken TBM.
The module is graded A after reception test.
I'm still not sure that wire-bonds of the new TBM is lower than capacitors. I'll try to glue a cap tomorrow
to see whether we could substitute TBMs on another 6 modules with broken TBMs. |
170
|
Wed Apr 1 14:36:37 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | M1646 failed Reception |
M1646 showed Idig=1A, ROC6 is not programmable.
Visual inspection: scratch on a periphery (between bonding pads) of ROC6.
To module doctor! |
171
|
Wed Apr 1 15:32:43 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1546 |
Andrey Starodumov wrote: | This is a module with a broken TBM. Silvan put a new one on top of the broken TBM.
The module is graded A after reception test.
I'm still not sure that wire-bonds of the new TBM is lower than capacitors. I'll try to glue a cap tomorrow
to see whether we could substitute TBMs on another 6 modules with broken TBMs. |
Cap has been glued to M1546. No damaged wire-bonds. Vthr-CalDel and PixelAlive are OK.
Module to be (FT) tested tomorrow. |
173
|
Thu Apr 2 17:06:19 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | M1652 failed Reception |
ROC1 of M1652 is not programmable.
Put in the "Bad" tray as C module. |
177
|
Fri Apr 3 13:55:48 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | M1653 failed Reception |
Roc12-15 are not programmable.
Visual inspection is Ok, nothing found.
To module doctor! |
179
|
Fri Apr 3 14:18:15 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1651 on April 2 |
Due to damaged module adapter the first Reception test failed and after MoreWeb analysis graded C.
After second Reception test (with proper connected cable) the grade is A.
To keep grade A instead of C in the MoreWeb summary table I removed the directory of the first Reception:
:~/L1_DATA/M1651_Reception_2020-04-02_16h09m_1585836596 (but the .tar file is still there), run python Controller.py -d (and remove raw with C grade from GlobalFinalResult) and rerun python Controller.py -m M1651 |
186
|
Mon Apr 6 14:27:31 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | M1593 |
Silvan has substituted the TBM0 of M1593.
I had to substitute a cable that has residuals and with which the Reception test failed completely.
The long cable has been attached.
Reception test grade: A |
187
|
Mon Apr 6 14:42:43 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1575 failed |
Silvan has substituted the TBM0 of M1575.
Still no hits in ROC0-ROC3: "NO DATA" "IDLE DATA" warnings
The long cable has been attached.
To module doctor! |
188
|
Mon Apr 6 14:52:09 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1657 failed |
No hits in ROC14 and ROC15.
Here is an error:
"ERROR: <datapipe.cc/CheckEventValidity:L524> Channel 5 Number of ROCs (1) != Token Chain Length (2)"
To module doctor! |
191
|
Tue Apr 7 14:26:48 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1567 failed |
After exchange of TBM1 the results is the same:
WAS:
1567: Grade C, no data from ROCs 8-11, looks like a problem with one TBM1 core
NOW:
-during ThrComp-CalDel scan: WARNING: Detected DESER400 trailer error bits: "IDLE DATA"
- result: INFO: CalDel: 135 134 126 121 158 141 119 133 _ 124 _ 107 _ 126 _ 108 133 91 138 120
ROC8-ROC11 no hits! |
192
|
Tue Apr 7 15:25:21 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1662 failed |
Address decoding of M1662 failed in one double column of ROC4.
To be decided what to do with this module.
Currently in C* tray. |
195
|
Tue Apr 7 18:02:07 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of 1654 |
After Silvan removed a cap and re-bonded broken and bent wires M1654 again has been tested.
RT grade is A.
Protection cap to be glued and to be (F)tested. |
196
|
Wed Apr 8 13:40:45 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1625 failed |
Silvan substituted TBM on this module.
Now ROC0 does not have hits.
Grade C, goes to "Bad" tray. |
197
|
Wed Apr 8 13:43:15 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1623 failed |
M1623: all ROCs are programmable but no readout from ROC8-ROC11.
Visual inspection is OK.
To module doctor. |
199
|
Wed Apr 8 15:20:38 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1665 |
With CtrlReg=9 RT grade was B due to 90 noisy pixels in ROC5.
Noisy in this case means that one pixel in a 2x2 cluster in a few column got 40 hits instead of 10.
With CtrlReg=17 this problem gone. RT grade is A. |
201
|
Wed Apr 8 17:17:13 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1662 failed |
Andrey Starodumov wrote: | Address decoding of M1662 failed in one double column of ROC4.
To be decided what to do with this module.
Currently in C* tray. |
With CtrlReg=17 the grade of module is B. Still in one double column "noisy" pixels: with hits from other 3 pixels of a cluster.
Stay in C* tray. To come back later. |
203
|
Thu Apr 9 14:36:10 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1669 and M1670 |
Both modules graded A. |