 Tue Apr 7 14:26:48 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, RT of M1567 failed
|
After exchange of TBM1 the results is the same:
WAS:
1567: Grade C, no data from ROCs 8-11, looks like a problem with one TBM1 core
NOW:
-during ThrComp-CalDel scan: WARNING: Detected DESER400 trailer error bits: "IDLE DATA"
- result: INFO: CalDel: 135 134 126 121 158 141 119 133 _ 124 _ 107 _ 126 _ 108 133 91 138 120
ROC8-ROC11 no hits! |
|
Mon Apr 6 17:18:02 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1606, M1630, M1655, M1566
|
M1606: B due to mean noise of several ROCs> 200e
M1639: C* due to failure many pixels of ROC1 at +10C as before: to be run at +10C with CtrlReg=17
M1655: B due to mean noise of several ROCs> 200e
M1656: B due to mean noise of several ROCs> 200e |
|
Mon Apr 6 17:07:23 2020, Andrey Starodumov, HDI test, 8 HDIs tested
|
HDIs
4937 5043 5042 4040
2029 4019 4018 4017
are tested. All OK. |
|
Mon Apr 6 14:52:09 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, RT of M1657 failed
|
No hits in ROC14 and ROC15.
Here is an error:
"ERROR: <datapipe.cc/CheckEventValidity:L524> Channel 5 Number of ROCs (1) != Token Chain Length (2)"
To module doctor! |
|
Mon Apr 6 14:42:43 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, RT of M1575 failed
|
Silvan has substituted the TBM0 of M1575.
Still no hits in ROC0-ROC3: "NO DATA" "IDLE DATA" warnings
The long cable has been attached.
To module doctor! |
|
Mon Apr 6 14:27:31 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, M1593
|
Silvan has substituted the TBM0 of M1593.
I had to substitute a cable that has residuals and with which the Reception test failed completely.
The long cable has been attached.
Reception test grade: A |
|
Thu Apr 2 22:50:33 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1645, M1646, M1647, M1648
|
| All modules graded B due to mean noise > 200 electrons. |
 Fri Apr 3 15:33:10 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1645, M1646, M1647, M1648
|
| Andrey Starodumov wrote: | | All modules graded B due to mean noise > 200 electrons. |
Correction:
in reality M1546 has been tested and NOT 1646. M1646 failed Reception due to not working ROC and graded C.
I hope we we will find a way to correct properly the module name and rerun MoreWeb analysis. |
|
Mon Apr 6 14:23:03 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1645, M1646, M1647, M1648
|
| Andrey Starodumov wrote: |
| Andrey Starodumov wrote: | | All modules graded B due to mean noise > 200 electrons. |
Correction:
in reality M1546 has been tested and NOT 1646. M1646 failed Reception due to not working ROC and graded C.
I hope we we will find a way to correct properly the module name and rerun MoreWeb analysis. |
Folder with test results has been renamed from M1646 to M1546:
mv M1646_FullQualification_2020-04-02_08h41m_1585809682 M1546_FullQualification_2020-04-02_08h41m_1585809682
Dinko fixed logfiles and .tar file.
Results of M1646 has been removed with python Controller.py -d (remove all rows related to M1646). |
|
Fri Apr 3 18:06:11 2020, Andrey Starodumov, HDI test, 2 HDIs tested
|
| HDIs 6018 and 6019 are passed tests. |
|
Fri Apr 3 17:39:19 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Module doctor, M1654
|
After a protection cap glued to M1654, I observed a few strongly bent wire bonds and probably some shorts on ROC8. One (VD+) of them is even detached (on HDI side). Pads from 25/26 till 35 are affected.
Nevertheless the Reception test gave the same results as before the cap gluing: grade A.
It would be useful if Wolfram take a look and decide what to do. Silvan proposed to remove cap and repair wire-bonds.
I could test the procedure on a dummy module (I have one) with glued cap and, if successful, do the same with M1654.
For the moment the module is placed in Module doctor tray. |
|
Fri Apr 3 17:29:51 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1557, M1591, M1649, M1651
|
M1557: C due to 214 pixel threshold failure in ROC4 only at +10C (several previous FTs at +10C were graded B!)
M1591: B due to mean noise > 200electrons for several ROCs
M1649: C due to 270 pixel threshold failure in ROC11 only at +10C
M1651: B due to mean noise > 200electrons for several ROCs
For both modules C grading is an artifact. Should decide how to proceed with such cases.
M1557 and M1649 will be placed for the moment in C* tray. |
|
Thu Mar 26 17:45:15 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1545, M1557, M1627, M1628
|
Retested M1545: C->B (to be correct on the MoreWeb summary page)
Retested 1557: C->C in one ROC >160 pixels failed to be trimmed Module placed in a tray C*
1627: B
1628: B
All B grades due to high (>200electons) mean noise. |
|
Fri Apr 3 15:21:54 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1545, M1557, M1627, M1628
|
| Andrey Starodumov wrote: | Retested M1545: C->B (to be correct on the MoreWeb summary page)
Retested 1557: C->C in one ROC >160 pixels failed to be trimmed Module placed in a tray C*
1627: B
1628: B
All B grades due to high (>200electons) mean noise. |
Final grade in the MoreWeb summary page is corrected.
Module graded B. |
|
Fri Apr 3 14:18:15 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, RT of M1651 on April 2
|
Due to damaged module adapter the first Reception test failed and after MoreWeb analysis graded C.
After second Reception test (with proper connected cable) the grade is A.
To keep grade A instead of C in the MoreWeb summary table I removed the directory of the first Reception:
:~/L1_DATA/M1651_Reception_2020-04-02_16h09m_1585836596 (but the .tar file is still there), run python Controller.py -d (and remove raw with C grade from GlobalFinalResult) and rerun python Controller.py -m M1651 |
|
Tue Mar 31 18:23:18 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1637, M1638, M1639, M1640
|
M1637: C. Graded C due to not completed first test at -20C. Urs has reported issues. The second -20C after T-Cycle and test at +10C are graded A.
Tomorrow I'll upgrade this module manually to A
M1638: A
M1639: B Due to B at first -20C test. ROC8 mean noise >200electrons. Second -20C and at +10C both are graded A
M1640: B All three FT are B due to several ROCs mean noise >200electrons |
|
Fri Apr 3 14:15:01 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1637, M1638, M1639, M1640
|
| Andrey Starodumov wrote: | M1637: C. Graded C due to not completed first test at -20C. Urs has reported issues. The second -20C after T-Cycle and test at +10C are graded A.
Tomorrow I'll upgrade this module manually to A
M1638: A
M1639: B Due to B at first -20C test. ROC8 mean noise >200electrons. Second -20C and at +10C both are graded A
M1640: B All three FT are B due to several ROCs mean noise >200electrons |
Following procedure of regrading the first -20C test has been manually upgraded to B. The final grade is A since manual upgrade was not taken in to account. I do not know why. So, the module will be graded A. |
|
Fri Apr 3 13:55:48 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, M1653 failed Reception
|
Roc12-15 are not programmable.
Visual inspection is Ok, nothing found.
To module doctor! |
|
Thu Apr 2 17:10:08 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Other, Cap glued to M1618
|
M1618 has been tested (FT ) on March 23 without a protection cap.
I have no idea how it's happened...
Today cap is glued and module passed Reception test again and it's A.
I think we do not need to repeat FT for this module.
I put it in a tray with good modules. |
|
Thu Apr 2 17:08:03 2020, Andrey Starodumov, HDI test, 6 HDIs tested
|
| 3013, 1046, 1047, 1048, 5038, 5039 are tested. All are OK. |
|
Thu Apr 2 17:06:19 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, M1652 failed Reception
|
ROC1 of M1652 is not programmable.
Put in the "Bad" tray as C module. |
|
Wed Apr 1 17:10:16 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1641-M1644
|
M1641: B due to mean noise > 200electons for a few ROCs
M1642: B due to mean noise > 200electons for a few ROCs
M1643: B due to mean noise > 200electons for a few ROCs
M1644: B due to mean noise > 200electons for one ROCs at -20C |
|
Tue Mar 31 17:33:37 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, RT of M1546
|
This is a module with a broken TBM. Silvan put a new one on top of the broken TBM.
The module is graded A after reception test.
I'm still not sure that wire-bonds of the new TBM is lower than capacitors. I'll try to glue a cap tomorrow
to see whether we could substitute TBMs on another 6 modules with broken TBMs. |
|
Wed Apr 1 15:32:43 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, RT of M1546
|
| Andrey Starodumov wrote: | This is a module with a broken TBM. Silvan put a new one on top of the broken TBM.
The module is graded A after reception test.
I'm still not sure that wire-bonds of the new TBM is lower than capacitors. I'll try to glue a cap tomorrow
to see whether we could substitute TBMs on another 6 modules with broken TBMs. |
Cap has been glued to M1546. No damaged wire-bonds. Vthr-CalDel and PixelAlive are OK.
Module to be (FT) tested tomorrow. |
|
Wed Apr 1 14:36:37 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, M1646 failed Reception
|
M1646 showed Idig=1A, ROC6 is not programmable.
Visual inspection: scratch on a periphery (between bonding pads) of ROC6.
To module doctor! |