| ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
|
208
|
Thu Apr 9 17:43:54 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | HDI test | 4 HDIa tested | | HDIs 3029, 3031, 3032, 4042 passed tests. All OK. |
|
207
|
Thu Apr 9 17:36:31 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1671 failed | ROC12-ROC15 no hits.
A candidate to TBM0 substitution, hence Grade C*.
To Module doctor1 |
|
206
|
Thu Apr 9 17:24:49 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1654, M1665, M1666, M1667 | M1654: Grade A
M1665: Grade B due to noisy pixels in ROC5. To be checked by module doctor!
M1666: Grade B due to mean noise of several chips > 200 electrons. Again on ROC12 there is a cluster of 31 dead bumps!
M1667: Grade B due to mean noise of several chips > 200 electrons. Again on ROC12 there is a cluster of 41 dead bumps!
M1665 goes to Module doctor! |
|
205
|
Thu Apr 9 16:13:51 2020 |
danek kotlinski | Module transfer | Modules moved to gel-pack |
| danek kotlinski wrote: | The following good module class A/B have been moved to gel-packs:
1607, 1608, 1609, 1610, 1612, 1613, 1614, 1618, 1619, 1620, 1622, 1624, 1626, 1627, 1628.
The following bad module, not-working and C class have been moved to gel-packs:
1544, 1563, 1567, 1675, 1593, 1594, 1611, 1615, 1616, 1617, 1621, 1625, 1646, 1650, 1652 |
A few corrections to the list of bad modules:
- On April 7 M1593 has been (F)-tested with a grade B due to Rel.gain width and mean noise of a few ROCs.
- 1611 should be C* since ROC13 has not working double column (160pixels) + 27 trimbit failures but very good trimmed threshold distribution, so these 27 trimbit failures should be ignored. |
|
204
|
Thu Apr 9 14:49:07 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1650 failed | Module has been tested on April 2nd.
Under Molex connector in ROC12 471 dead or noisy pixels.
Grade C. |
|
203
|
Thu Apr 9 14:36:10 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1669 and M1670 | | Both modules graded A. |
|
202
|
Thu Apr 9 14:19:40 2020 |
danek kotlinski | Module transfer | Modules moved to gel-pack | The following good module class A/B have been moved to gel-packs:
1607, 1608, 1609, 1610, 1612, 1613, 1614, 1618, 1619, 1620, 1622, 1624, 1626, 1627, 1628.
The following bad module, not-working and C class have been moved to gel-packs:
1544, 1563, 1567, 1675, 1593, 1594, 1611, 1615, 1616, 1617, 1621, 1625, 1646, 1650, 1652 |
|
201
|
Wed Apr 8 17:17:13 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1662 failed |
| Andrey Starodumov wrote: | Address decoding of M1662 failed in one double column of ROC4.
To be decided what to do with this module.
Currently in C* tray. |
With CtrlReg=17 the grade of module is B. Still in one double column "noisy" pixels: with hits from other 3 pixels of a cluster.
Stay in C* tray. To come back later. |
|
200
|
Wed Apr 8 17:09:05 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1572, M1661, M1663, M1664 | M1572: Grade B due to mean noise of ROC4 211 electrons
M1661: Grade B due to mean noise of a few ROCs > 200 electrons and in ROC12 44 pixels failed threshold cut
M1663: Grade B due to mean noise of a few ROCs > 200 electrons
M1664: Grade B due to mean noise of a few ROCs > 200 electrons and in ROC12 44 pixels failed threshold cut |
|
199
|
Wed Apr 8 15:20:38 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1665 | With CtrlReg=9 RT grade was B due to 90 noisy pixels in ROC5.
Noisy in this case means that one pixel in a 2x2 cluster in a few column got 40 hits instead of 10.
With CtrlReg=17 this problem gone. RT grade is A. |
|
198
|
Wed Apr 8 15:02:37 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Software | Change of CrtlReg for RT | So far in a blue box for RT tbm10d_procv3 parameters were used.
This is wrong, since CtrlReg=9 is better for -20C while for +10 or higher T
CtrlReg=17 is better.
From now on for RT tbm10d_procv4 will be used. |
|
197
|
Wed Apr 8 13:43:15 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1623 failed | M1623: all ROCs are programmable but no readout from ROC8-ROC11.
Visual inspection is OK.
To module doctor. |
|
196
|
Wed Apr 8 13:40:45 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1625 failed | Silvan substituted TBM on this module.
Now ROC0 does not have hits.
Grade C, goes to "Bad" tray. |
|
195
|
Tue Apr 7 18:02:07 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of 1654 | After Silvan removed a cap and re-bonded broken and bent wires M1654 again has been tested.
RT grade is A.
Protection cap to be glued and to be (F)tested. |
|
194
|
Tue Apr 7 17:59:27 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | HDI test | 6 HDIs tested | HDIs
2030, 2031, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1035
are tested. All OK. |
|
193
|
Tue Apr 7 16:57:01 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1593, M1658, M1659, M1660 | M1593: B due to Rel.gain width and mean noise of a few ROCs
M1658: B due to threshold and mean noise of ROC15
M1659: B due to threshold and mean noise of a few ROCs
M1660: C due to 172 pixels failed Threshold (trimmed) on ROC7 only at second -20C, the first -20C and +10C trimming threshold is OK for this chip
M1660 to C* tray and retest with all other modules after production, |
|
192
|
Tue Apr 7 15:25:21 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1662 failed | Address decoding of M1662 failed in one double column of ROC4.
To be decided what to do with this module.
Currently in C* tray. |
|
191
|
Tue Apr 7 14:26:48 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1567 failed | After exchange of TBM1 the results is the same:
WAS:
1567: Grade C, no data from ROCs 8-11, looks like a problem with one TBM1 core
NOW:
-during ThrComp-CalDel scan: WARNING: Detected DESER400 trailer error bits: "IDLE DATA"
- result: INFO: CalDel: 135 134 126 121 158 141 119 133 _ 124 _ 107 _ 126 _ 108 133 91 138 120
ROC8-ROC11 no hits! |
|
190
|
Mon Apr 6 17:18:02 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1606, M1630, M1655, M1566 | M1606: B due to mean noise of several ROCs> 200e
M1639: C* due to failure many pixels of ROC1 at +10C as before: to be run at +10C with CtrlReg=17
M1655: B due to mean noise of several ROCs> 200e
M1656: B due to mean noise of several ROCs> 200e |
|
189
|
Mon Apr 6 17:07:23 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | HDI test | 8 HDIs tested | HDIs
4937 5043 5042 4040
2029 4019 4018 4017
are tested. All OK. |
|