ELOG Layer 1 Replacement

Layer 1 Replacement Elog, Page 7 of 16

Not logged in

Full | Summary | Threaded

Error: Attribute "Type" for quick filter not found 303 Entries

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 14, 15, 16 Next All

ID	Date	Author	Category	Subject	Text
120	Fri Mar 20 17:05:58 2020	Andrey Starodumov	Reception test	M1617 failed	ROC8 of M1617 is programmable but no readout from it. Silvan noticed that a corner of one ROC of
123	Sun Mar 22 13:57:25 2020	Danek Kotlinski	Reception test	M1617 failed	[quote="Andrey Starodumov"]ROC8 of M1617 is programmable but no readout from it. Silvan noticed that a corner of one ROC of
119	Fri Mar 20 14:53:52 2020	Andrey Starodumov	Reception test	M1616 failed	ROC10 of M1616 is not programmable, no readout from ROC10 and ROC11. Visual inspection of wire bonds - OK
124	Sun Mar 22 14:02:20 2020	Danek Kotlinski	Reception test	M1616 failed	[quote="Andrey Starodumov"]ROC10 of M1616 is not programmable, no readout from ROC10 and ROC11.
118	Fri Mar 20 14:46:31 2020	Andrey Starodumov	Reception test	M1615 failed	M1615 is programmable but "no working phases found" Visual inspection of wire bonds - OK.
125	Sun Mar 22 14:05:20 2020	Danek Kotlinski	Reception test	M1615 failed	[quote="Andrey Starodumov"]M1615 is programmable but "no working phases found" Visual inspection of wire bonds - OK.
297	Fri Aug 28 11:13:33 2020	Andrey Starodumov	Module grading	M1615	M1615: one pixel in ROC10 unmaskable hence should be graded C. Otherwise the module is of grade A
285	Fri Jun 5 13:47:11 2020	Andrey Starodumov	Module grading	M1613	FT of this modules has been done twice: March 23 and March 25, in both cases with the final test SW. On March 23 module was graded C
116	Thu Mar 19 17:17:27 2020	Andrey Starodumov	Reception test	M1609-M16012	Reception test done and caps are glued to modules M1609-M1612. M1611 graded B due to double column failure
142	Thu Mar 26 10:41:24 2020	danek kotlinski	Module grading	M1606	I have looked more closely at M1606. Trimming show problems in ROC2, 8 pixels have 0 threshold and for 61 pixels thr=-1.
143	Thu Mar 26 15:37:18 2020	Urs	Module grading	M1606	attached find the threshold difference distributions for all four trimbits for all ROCs
258	Mon May 11 14:14:05 2020	danek kotlinski	Other	M1606	On Friday I have tested M1606 at room temperature in the red cold box. Previously it was reported that trimming
114	Wed Mar 18 17:43:41 2020	Andrey Starodumov	Module assembly	M1605-M1608	M1605 and M1606: reception done on Mar 17 M1607 and M1608: reception done today All: grade A
110	Mon Mar 16 15:17:18 2020	Matej Roguljic	Module assembly	M1601 and M1602	Andrey and I assembled modules 1601 and 1602 on Friday, 13.3. On Monday, 16.3. I ran reception on them (both graded A) and then glued protection
299	Fri Aug 28 12:02:48 2020	Andrey Starodumov	XRay HR tests	M1599	ROC5 has eff=93.65% and should be graded C. Somehow efficiency was not taken into account for HR test grading???
301	Wed Sep 2 16:09:24 2020	Matej Roguljic	Modules for P	M1595 switch with M1558	Module 1595 was foreseen to go on the inner ladder 5, position -2 (negative two). During the pre-installation test, we saw it had
186	Mon Apr 6 14:27:31 2020	Andrey Starodumov	Reception test	M1593	Silvan has substituted the TBM0 of M1593. I had to substitute a cable that has residuals and with which the Reception test failed
99	Wed Mar 11 15:34:57 2020	Urs Langenegger	Other	M1586: issues with MOLEX?	Module M1586 had passed the full qualification on 20/02/27. I had had to re-insert the cable in the Molex connector for it to become programmable.
100	Wed Mar 11 16:48:10 2020	Andrey Starodumov	Other	M1586: issues with MOLEX?	[quote="Urs Langenegger"]Module M1586 had passed the full qualification on 20/02/27. I had had to re-insert the cable in the Molex
246	Fri May 1 19:34:01 2020	danek kotlinski	Module grading	M1582	M1582 was classified as C because of 167 pixels failing trimming in ROC1. I have tested this module.

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 14, 15, 16 Next All

ELOG V3.1.3-7933898