| ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
208
|
Thu Apr 9 17:43:54 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | HDI test | 4 HDIa tested | HDIs 3029, 3031, 3032, 4042 passed tests.
All OK. |
|
|
207
|
Thu Apr 9 17:36:31 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1671 failed | ROC12-ROC15 no hits.
A candidate to TBM0 substitution, hence Grade
C*.
|
|
|
206
|
Thu Apr 9 17:24:49 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1654, M1665, M1666, M1667 | M1654: Grade A
M1665: Grade B due to noisy pixels in ROC5.
To be checked by module doctor!
|
|
|
205
|
Thu Apr 9 16:13:51 2020 |
danek kotlinski | Module transfer | Modules moved to gel-pack | [quote="danek kotlinski"]The following good
module class A/B have been moved to gel-packs:
1607, 1608, 1609, 1610, 1612, 1613, 1614, |
|
|
204
|
Thu Apr 9 14:49:07 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1650 failed | Module has been tested on April 2nd.
Under Molex connector in ROC12 471 dead or
noisy pixels.
|
|
|
203
|
Thu Apr 9 14:36:10 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1669 and M1670 | Both modules graded A. |
|
|
202
|
Thu Apr 9 14:19:40 2020 |
danek kotlinski | Module transfer | Modules moved to gel-pack | The following good module class A/B have been
moved to gel-packs:
1607, 1608, 1609, 1610, 1612, 1613, 1614, |
|
|
201
|
Wed Apr 8 17:17:13 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1662 failed | [quote="Andrey Starodumov"]Address decoding
of M1662 failed in one double column of ROC4.
To be decided what to do with this module.
|
|
|
200
|
Wed Apr 8 17:09:05 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1572, M1661, M1663, M1664 | M1572: Grade B due to mean noise of ROC4 211
electrons
M1661: Grade B due to mean noise of a few |
|
|
199
|
Wed Apr 8 15:20:38 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1665 | With CtrlReg=9 RT grade was B due to 90 noisy
pixels in ROC5.
Noisy in this case means that one pixel in |
|
|
198
|
Wed Apr 8 15:02:37 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Software | Change of CrtlReg for RT | So far in a blue box for RT tbm10d_procv3
parameters were used.
This is wrong, since CtrlReg=9 is better |
|
|
197
|
Wed Apr 8 13:43:15 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1623 failed | M1623: all ROCs are programmable but no readout
from ROC8-ROC11.
Visual inspection is OK.
|
|
|
196
|
Wed Apr 8 13:40:45 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1625 failed | Silvan substituted TBM on this module.
Now ROC0 does not have hits.
Grade C, goes to "Bad" tray. |
|
|
195
|
Tue Apr 7 18:02:07 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of 1654 | After Silvan removed a cap and re-bonded broken
and bent wires M1654 again has been tested.
RT grade is A.
|
|
|
194
|
Tue Apr 7 17:59:27 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | HDI test | 6 HDIs tested | HDIs
2030, 2031, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1035
are tested. All OK. |
|
|
193
|
Tue Apr 7 16:57:01 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1593, M1658, M1659, M1660 | M1593: B due to Rel.gain width and mean noise
of a few ROCs
M1658: B due to threshold and mean noise |
|
|
192
|
Tue Apr 7 15:25:21 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1662 failed | Address decoding of M1662 failed in one double
column of ROC4.
To be decided what to do with this module.
|
|
|
191
|
Tue Apr 7 14:26:48 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Reception test | RT of M1567 failed | After exchange of TBM1 the results is the
same:
|
|
|
190
|
Mon Apr 6 17:18:02 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1606, M1630, M1655, M1566 | M1606: B due to mean noise of several ROCs>
200e
M1639: C* due to failure many pixels of ROC1 |
|
|
189
|
Mon Apr 6 17:07:23 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | HDI test | 8 HDIs tested | HDIs
4937 5043 5042 4040
2029 4019 4018 4017
|
|