 Tue Apr 28 18:11:45 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1586, M1587, M1588, M1589
|
M1586: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
M1587: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
M1588: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
|
|
Tue May 5 13:58:45 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1582, M1649, M1667
|
M1582: Grade C due to trimming failure in ROC1 for 189 pixels at +10C. This is third time module restesed:
1) February 26 (trimming for VCal 40 and old PH optimization): Grade B, max 29 failed pixels and in few ROCs mean noise
2) April 27: Grade C due to trimming failure in ROC1 for 167 pixels at +10C, at -20C still max 45 failed pixels and in few ROCs mean noise
|
|
Tue Apr 28 18:06:41 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1582, M1583, M1584, M1585
|
Modules tested om Apr 27
M1582: Grade C due to 167 pixels failed trimming on ROC1 at +10C only. Previous test on Feb 26 at +10C was graded B!
M1583: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
|
|
Wed May 6 16:24:21 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1580, M1595, M1606, M1659
|
M1580: Grade B due to mean noise >200e in ROC5/8 and trimming failures for 100+ pixels in the same ROCs at +10C, previous result of April 27 was better
M1595: Grade B due to mean noise >200e in few ROCs, previous result of April 30 was much worse with 80/90 pixels failed trimming in ROC0 and ROC15
M1606: Grade C due to 192 pixels failed trimming in ROC2 at +10C, previous result of April 6 was much better with B grade
|
|
Mon Apr 27 13:50:09 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1578, M1579, M1580, M1581
|
M1578: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs and 67 pixels failed trimming in ROC1 at -20C
M1579: Grade A
M1580: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs and 59/112 pixels failed trimming in ROC5/ROC8 at +10C
|
|
Wed May 6 13:20:28 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1574, M1581, M1660, M1668
|
Modules tested on May 5th
M1574: Grade B due to mean noise >200e in ROC10 and trimming failures for 89 pixels in ROC0, the same as the first time April 24 (there 104 pixels failed)
M1581: Grade B due to mean noise >200e in ROC8/13, no trimming failures in ROC8/13, as it was on April 27 (120+ pixel in ROC8/13 failed) ->[COLOR=red] |
|
Mon Apr 27 13:23:47 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1573, M1574, M1576, M1577
|
Test has been done on April 24
M1573: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
M1574: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs and trimming failed for >100 pixels and RelGainWidth too wide for ROC0
|
|
Wed Apr 8 17:09:05 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1572, M1661, M1663, M1664
|
M1572: Grade B due to mean noise of ROC4 211 electrons
M1661: Grade B due to mean noise of a few ROCs > 200 electrons and in ROC12 44 pixels failed threshold cut
M1663: Grade B due to mean noise of a few ROCs > 200 electrons
|
|
Fri Apr 24 13:59:43 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1568, M1569, M1570, M1571
|
M1568: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs and for ROC0 RelGainWidth(=0.1) is twice larger then for other ROCs
M1569: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
M1570: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
|
|
Thu Apr 23 17:26:51 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1561, M1564, M1565, M1566
|
M1561: Grade B due to several ROCs mean noise >200e
M1564: Grade B due to two ROCs mean noise >200e
M1565: Grade B due to two ROCs mean noise >200e
|
|
Fri Apr 3 17:29:51 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1557, M1591, M1649, M1651
|
M1557: C due to 214 pixel threshold failure in ROC4 only at +10C (several previous FTs at +10C were graded B!)
M1591: B due to mean noise > 200electrons for several ROCs
M1649: C due to 270 pixel threshold failure in ROC11 only at +10C
|
|
Thu Apr 23 13:37:29 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1556, M1557, M1559, M1560
|
M1556: Grade B due to several ROCs mean noise >200e
M1557: Grade B due to several ROCs mean noise >200e and trimming failed for 60 pixel in ROC4 at -20C
M1559: Grade A
|
|
Mon May 4 14:13:39 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1552, M1553, M1595, M1597
|
FT on April 30th
M1552: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for ROC7,8
M1553: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
|
|
Thu Apr 30 15:25:36 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1548, M1549, M1550, M1551
|
M1548: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for ROC11
M1549: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for ROC2. In total 200+ pixels failed trimming in the module [COLOR=red]-> investigate???[/COLOR]
M1550: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for ROC5
|
|
Thu Mar 26 17:45:15 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1545, M1557, M1627, M1628
|
Retested M1545: C->B (to be correct on the MoreWeb summary page)
Retested 1557: C->C in one ROC >160 pixels failed to be trimmed [B]Module placed in a tray C*[/B]
1627: B
|
 Fri Apr 3 15:21:54 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1545, M1557, M1627, M1628
|
[quote="Andrey Starodumov"]Retested M1545: C->B (to be correct on the MoreWeb summary page)
Retested 1557: C->C in one ROC >160 pixels failed to be trimmed [B]Module placed in a tray C*[/B]
1627: B
|
|
Fri Apr 17 18:05:45 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1542, M1557, M1630, M1649 only at +10C
|
M1542 has grade C for relative gain width. Was tested with early versions of test SW with trim VCal=40 and not yet optimized PH optimization/calibration.
Other modules have grade C only at +10C. This time CtrlReg=17 instead of 9 is used/
M1542: Grade B due to 61 pixels failed Threshold criteria (trimming)
|
|
Tue Apr 21 17:39:48 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1542, M1554, M1555, M1653
|
M1542: Grade C due to massive (>1000pixels in total) trimming failures at -20C in ROC11,14,15. There was no such problem at previous test when CtrlReg=9
was used, while for the present test CtrlReg=17 was used
M1554: Grade C due to massive (>1000pixels in total) trimming failures at -20C in ROC9,13. There was no such problem at previous test when CtrlReg=9 was |
|
Wed Apr 22 17:41:11 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1542, M1554, M1555, M1653
|
[quote="Andrey Starodumov"]
M1542: Grade C due to massive (>1000pixels in total) trimming failures at -20C in ROC11,14,15. There was no such problem at previous test when CtrlReg=9
was used, while for the present test CtrlReg=17 was used
|
|
Thu Apr 23 13:34:52 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1542, M1554, M1555, M1653
|
[quote="Andrey Starodumov"][quote="Andrey Starodumov"]
M1542: Grade C due to massive (>1000pixels in total) trimming failures at -20C in ROC11,14,15. There was no such problem at previous test when CtrlReg=9
was used, while for the present test CtrlReg=17 was used
|
|