 Tue Apr 28 18:06:41 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1582, M1583, M1584, M1585
|
Modules tested om Apr 27
M1582: Grade C due to 167 pixels failed trimming on ROC1 at +10C only. Previous test on Feb 26 at +10C was graded B!
M1583: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
|
|
Tue Apr 28 18:11:45 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1586, M1587, M1588, M1589
|
M1586: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
M1587: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
M1588: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
|
|
Wed Apr 29 14:08:42 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1536, M1537, M1538
|
M1536: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for ROC1
M1537: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
M1538: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs and trimming failure for 70 pixels in ROC14 at -20C |
|
Wed Apr 29 18:11:36 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1590, M1592, M1596, M1600
|
Modules tested om April 28
M1590: Grade B Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
M1592: Grade B Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
|
|
Thu Apr 30 15:16:58 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1540, M1541, M1543, M1547
|
Modules tested om April 29
M1540: Grade B due to many (>1000) pixels failed trimming but only 70 are in "C-zone" for ROC0 at -20C [COLOR=red]-> retest!!![/COLOR]
M1541: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
|
|
Thu Apr 30 15:25:36 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1548, M1549, M1550, M1551
|
M1548: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for ROC11
M1549: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for ROC2. In total 200+ pixels failed trimming in the module [COLOR=red]-> investigate???[/COLOR]
M1550: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for ROC5
|
 Thu Apr 30 17:33:04 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Software, MoReWeb empty DAC plots
|
[quote="Matej Roguljic"]Some of the DAC parameters plots were empty in the total production overview page. All the empty plots had the number "35" in them
(e.g. DAC distribution m20_1 vana 35). The problem was tracked down to the trimming configuration. Moreweb was expecting us to trim to Vcal 35, while we
decided to trim to Vcal 50. I "grepped" where this was hardcoded and changed 35->50.
|
|
Mon May 4 14:13:39 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1552, M1553, M1595, M1597
|
FT on April 30th
M1552: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for ROC7,8
M1553: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
|
|
Mon May 4 14:18:20 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1540, 1549, 1571, 1598
|
M1540: Grade A
M1549: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for ROC2 and 48 dead pixels in ROC5
M1571: Grade B due to mean noise >200e for many ROCs
|
|
Mon May 4 15:28:14 2020, Andrey Starodumov, General, M1660
|
M1660 is taken from gel-pak and cabled for retest.
This module was graded C only at second FT at-20C, the first FT at -20C and FT at +10C give grade B. Massive trimming failure of pixels in ROC7 was not
observed.
|
|
Tue May 5 13:58:45 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1582, M1649, M1667
|
M1582: Grade C due to trimming failure in ROC1 for 189 pixels at +10C. This is third time module restesed:
1) February 26 (trimming for VCal 40 and old PH optimization): Grade B, max 29 failed pixels and in few ROCs mean noise
2) April 27: Grade C due to trimming failure in ROC1 for 167 pixels at +10C, at -20C still max 45 failed pixels and in few ROCs mean noise
|
|
Wed May 6 13:20:28 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1574, M1581, M1660, M1668
|
Modules tested on May 5th
M1574: Grade B due to mean noise >200e in ROC10 and trimming failures for 89 pixels in ROC0, the same as the first time April 24 (there 104 pixels failed)
M1581: Grade B due to mean noise >200e in ROC8/13, no trimming failures in ROC8/13, as it was on April 27 (120+ pixel in ROC8/13 failed) ->[COLOR=red] |
|
Wed May 6 16:24:21 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1580, M1595, M1606, M1659
|
M1580: Grade B due to mean noise >200e in ROC5/8 and trimming failures for 100+ pixels in the same ROCs at +10C, previous result of April 27 was better
M1595: Grade B due to mean noise >200e in few ROCs, previous result of April 30 was much worse with 80/90 pixels failed trimming in ROC0 and ROC15
M1606: Grade C due to 192 pixels failed trimming in ROC2 at +10C, previous result of April 6 was much better with B grade
|
|
Mon May 11 13:19:51 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Cold box tests, M1539
|
After several attempts including reconnecting the cable, M1539 had no readout if it's connected to TB3. When connected to TB1, M1539 did not show any problem.
M1606 worked properly both with TB1 and TB3.
For FT test the configuration is following:
|
|
Tue May 12 13:29:27 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1539, M1582, M1606
|
M1539: Grade B due to mean noise >200e in few ROCs
M1582: Grade B due to mean noise >200e in few ROCs and at -20C 137 pixels in ROC1 failed trimming. For P5 could use older test results (trim parameters)
of April 27 M20_1 when only 23 pixels in ROC1 failed trimming
|
|
Wed May 13 17:57:45 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Other, L1_DATA backup
|
| L1_DATA files are backed up to the LaCie disk |
|
Fri May 15 17:15:34 2020, Andrey Starodumov, XRay HR tests, Analysis of HRT: M1630, M1632, M1636, M1638
|
Krunal proved test result of four modules and Dinko analised them.
M1630: Grade A, VCal calibration: Slope=43.5e-/Vcal, Offset=-145.4e-
M1632: Grade A, VCal calibration: Slope=45.4e-/Vcal, Offset=-290.8e-
|
|
Mon May 18 14:05:01 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Module transfer, 8 modules shipped to ETHZ
|
M1555, M1556, M1557,
M1558, M1559, M1560,
M1561, M1564 |
|
Tue May 19 13:43:55 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Module transfer, 9 modules shipped to PSI
|
Quick check: Leakage current, set Vana, VthrCompCalDel and PixelAlive
Module Current@-150V Programmable Readout
M1623 -0.335uA OK OK
|
|
Fri May 22 16:06:43 2020, Andrey Starodumov, XRay HR tests, Analysis of HRT: M1623, M1632, M1634, M1636-M1639,M1640
|
Module HRtest VCal calibration Grade
#defects max #noisy pix
ColdBox XRay
|
|