| ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
176
|
Thu Apr 2 22:50:33 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1645, M1646, M1647, M1648 | All modules graded B due to mean noise > 200
electrons. |
|
|
181
|
Fri Apr 3 15:33:10 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1645, M1646, M1647, M1648 | [quote="Andrey Starodumov"]All modules graded
B due to mean noise > 200 electrons.[/quote]
Correction:
|
|
|
185
|
Mon Apr 6 14:23:03 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1645, M1646, M1647, M1648 | [quote="Andrey Starodumov"][quote="Andrey
Starodumov"]All modules graded B due to mean
noise > 200 electrons.[/quote]
|
|
|
172
|
Wed Apr 1 17:10:16 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1641-M1644 | M1641: B due to mean noise > 200electons for
a few ROCs
M1642: B due to mean noise > 200electons |
|
|
169
|
Tue Mar 31 18:23:18 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1637, M1638, M1639, M1640 | M1637: C. Graded C due to not completed first
test at -20C. Urs has reported issues. The
second -20C after T-Cycle and test at +10C |
|
|
178
|
Fri Apr 3 14:15:01 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1637, M1638, M1639, M1640 | [quote="Andrey Starodumov"]M1637: C. Graded
C due to not completed first test at -20C.
Urs has reported issues. The second -20C |
|
|
154
|
Fri Mar 27 18:29:53 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1629, M1630, M1631, M1632 | M1629: B due to mean noise at -20C
M1630: C due to ROC1 with all pixels failed
of PH calibration (Gain). Both FT at -20C |
|
|
156
|
Mon Mar 30 14:52:59 2020 |
Danek Kotlinski | Full test | FT of M1629, M1630, M1631, M1632 | I have tested M1630.
I see not problem with ROC1. See the attached
plot.
|
|
|
157
|
Mon Mar 30 15:40:52 2020 |
Urs | Full test | FT of M1629, M1630, M1631, M1632 | M1630 is interesting because (I am using my
terminology in the following) for the test
at T=+10C ROC1 fails the PH optimization |
|
|
215
|
Wed Apr 15 17:26:46 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1623, M1657, M1673, M1674 | M1623: Grade B due to rel gain width, in ROC4
74 pixels failed trimming (Threshold) and
mean noise >200e
|
|
|
131
|
Tue Mar 24 18:09:07 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1615, M1619, M1620, M1622 | Test results have been analysed with modified
code:
M1615: B
|
|
|
137
|
Wed Mar 25 17:03:11 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1615, M1619, M1620, M1622 | [quote="Andrey Starodumov"]Test results have
been analysed with modified code:
M1615: B
|
|
|
122
|
Fri Mar 20 18:32:34 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1609-M1612 | M1609 and M1611 are graded C
M1610 and M1612 are graded B
|
|
|
134
|
Wed Mar 25 14:17:51 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1609, M1613, M1614, M1618 on Mar 23 | FT for these modules has been done on Mar
23
M1609: C
|
|
|
190
|
Mon Apr 6 17:18:02 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1606, M1630, M1655, M1566 | M1606: B due to mean noise of several ROCs>
200e
M1639: C* due to failure many pixels of ROC1 |
|
|
117
|
Thu Mar 19 18:01:50 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1605-M1608 | Only M1607 graded B. All others are graded
C due to trimbit test.
M1606 should be looked carefully and may |
|
|
115
|
Wed Mar 18 17:46:07 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1601-M1604 | M1601-M1604 passed full test
M1601: grade B
M1602-M1604: Grade C. The main reason is |
|
|
140
|
Wed Mar 25 18:40:53 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1599, M1613, M1624, M1616 | M1599: B due to leakage current at +10 (2-3umA)
M1613: B due to a few pixels with bad trimmed
threshold
|
|
|
193
|
Tue Apr 7 16:57:01 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1593, M1658, M1659, M1660 | M1593: B due to Rel.gain width and mean noise
of a few ROCs
M1658: B due to threshold and mean noise |
|
|
239
|
Wed Apr 29 18:11:36 2020 |
Andrey Starodumov | Full test | FT of M1590, M1592, M1596, M1600 | Modules tested om April 28
M1590: Grade B Grade B due to mean noise
>200e for a few ROCs
|
|