 Thu Apr 2 22:50:33 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1645, M1646, M1647, M1648
|
| All modules graded B due to mean noise > 200 electrons. |
 Fri Apr 3 15:33:10 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1645, M1646, M1647, M1648
|
[quote="Andrey Starodumov"]All modules graded B due to mean noise > 200 electrons.[/quote]
Correction:
in reality M1546 has been tested and NOT 1646. M1646 failed Reception due to not working ROC and graded C.
|
|
Mon Apr 6 14:23:03 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1645, M1646, M1647, M1648
|
[quote="Andrey Starodumov"][quote="Andrey Starodumov"]All modules graded B due to mean noise > 200 electrons.[/quote]
Correction:
in reality M1546 has been tested and NOT 1646. M1646 failed Reception due to not working ROC and graded C.
|
|
Wed Apr 1 17:10:16 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1641-M1644
|
M1641: B due to mean noise > 200electons for a few ROCs
M1642: B due to mean noise > 200electons for a few ROCs
M1643: B due to mean noise > 200electons for a few ROCs
|
|
Tue Mar 31 18:23:18 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1637, M1638, M1639, M1640
|
M1637: C. Graded C due to not completed first test at -20C. Urs has reported issues. The second -20C after T-Cycle and test at +10C are graded A.
Tomorrow I'll upgrade this module manually to A
M1638: A
|
|
Fri Apr 3 14:15:01 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1637, M1638, M1639, M1640
|
[quote="Andrey Starodumov"]M1637: C. Graded C due to not completed first test at -20C. Urs has reported issues. The second -20C after T-Cycle and test at
+10C are graded A.
Tomorrow I'll upgrade this module manually to A
|
|
Fri Mar 27 18:29:53 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1629, M1630, M1631, M1632
|
M1629: B due to mean noise at -20C
M1630: C due to ROC1 with all pixels failed of PH calibration (Gain). Both FT at -20C are A!
Should be understood and retested. Put in C* tray.
|
Mon Mar 30 14:52:59 2020, Danek Kotlinski, Full test, FT of M1629, M1630, M1631, M1632 
|
I have tested M1630.
I see not problem with ROC1. See the attached plot.
There is one dcol in ROC12 which shoes the "pattern" problem seen in a few other ROCs.
|
|
Mon Mar 30 15:40:52 2020, Urs, Full test, FT of M1629, M1630, M1631, M1632
|
M1630 is interesting because (I am using my terminology in the following) for the test at T=+10C ROC1 fails the PH optimization test and by consequence
the gain/pedestal test is also failed.
|
|
Wed Apr 15 17:26:46 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1623, M1657, M1673, M1674
|
M1623: Grade B due to rel gain width, in ROC4 74 pixels failed trimming (Threshold) and mean noise >200e
M1657: Grade B due to 70 dead pixels in ROC12 and mean noise >200e
M1673: Grade B due to mean noise >200e in a few ROCs
|
|
Tue Mar 24 18:09:07 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1615, M1619, M1620, M1622
|
Test results have been analysed with modified code:
M1615: B
M1619: A
|
|
Wed Mar 25 17:03:11 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1615, M1619, M1620, M1622
|
[quote="Andrey Starodumov"]Test results have been analysed with modified code:
M1615: B
M1619: A
|
|
Fri Mar 20 18:32:34 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1609-M1612
|
M1609 and M1611 are graded C
M1610 and M1612 are graded B
|
|
Wed Mar 25 14:17:51 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1609, M1613, M1614, M1618 on Mar 23
|
FT for these modules has been done on Mar 23
M1609: C
M1613: C
|
|
Mon Apr 6 17:18:02 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1606, M1630, M1655, M1566
|
M1606: B due to mean noise of several ROCs> 200e
M1639: C* due to failure many pixels of ROC1 at +10C as before: to be run at +10C with CtrlReg=17
M1655: B due to mean noise of several ROCs> 200e
|
|
Thu Mar 19 18:01:50 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1605-M1608
|
Only M1607 graded B. All others are graded C due to trimbit test.
M1606 should be looked carefully and may be retested since the threshold after trimming has strange features
(although not for all temperatures) that may mean that some trimbits really do not work.
|
|
Wed Mar 18 17:46:07 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1601-M1604
|
M1601-M1604 passed full test
M1601: grade B
M1602-M1604: Grade C. The main reason is failed pixels during trimbit test.
|
|
Wed Mar 25 18:40:53 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1599, M1613, M1624, M1616
|
M1599: B due to leakage current at +10 (2-3umA)
M1613: B due to a few pixels with bad trimmed threshold
M1624: B due to a few ROCs with mean noise>200electrons
|
|
Tue Apr 7 16:57:01 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1593, M1658, M1659, M1660
|
M1593: B due to Rel.gain width and mean noise of a few ROCs
M1658: B due to threshold and mean noise of ROC15
M1659: B due to threshold and mean noise of a few ROCs
|
|
Wed Apr 29 18:11:36 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1590, M1592, M1596, M1600
|
Modules tested om April 28
M1590: Grade B Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
M1592: Grade B Grade B due to mean noise >200e for a few ROCs
|