 Thu Apr 30 17:24:57 2020, Dinko Ferencek, Software, MoReWeb empty DAC plots
|
[quote="Matej Roguljic"]Some of the DAC parameters plots were empty in the production overview page. All the empty plots had the number "35" in them (e.g.
DAC distribution m20_1 vana 35). The problem was tracked down to the trimming configuration. Moreweb was expecting us to trim to Vcal 35, while we decided
to trim to Vcal 50. I "grepped" where this was hardcoded and changed 35->50.
|
|
Thu Apr 30 17:33:04 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Software, MoReWeb empty DAC plots
|
[quote="Matej Roguljic"]Some of the DAC parameters plots were empty in the total production overview page. All the empty plots had the number "35" in them
(e.g. DAC distribution m20_1 vana 35). The problem was tracked down to the trimming configuration. Moreweb was expecting us to trim to Vcal 35, while we
decided to trim to Vcal 50. I "grepped" where this was hardcoded and changed 35->50.
|
|
Thu May 7 00:10:15 2020, Dinko Ferencek, Software, MoReWeb empty DAC plots
|
[quote="Andrey Starodumov"][quote="Matej Roguljic"]Some of the DAC parameters plots were empty in the total production overview page. All the empty plots
had the number "35" in them (e.g. DAC distribution m20_1 vana 35). The problem was tracked down to the trimming configuration. Moreweb was expecting us
to trim to Vcal 35, while we decided to trim to Vcal 50. I "grepped" where this was hardcoded and changed 35->50.
|
 Fri Jan 24 18:12:00 2020, Dinko Ferencek, Software, MoReWeb code updates
|
MoReWeb code updated to include the ROC wafer info in the XrayCalibration and XRayHRQualification pages:
[URL=https://gitlab.cern.ch/CMS-IRB/MoReWeb/commit/4de8ea39050600367ae0b8e959fcc00f29be45d8]https://gitlab.cern.ch/CMS-IRB/MoReWeb/commit/4de8ea39050600367ae0b8e959fcc00f29be45d8[/URL]
|
|
Sun Feb 9 18:36:13 2020, Dinko Ferencek, Module grading, Manual grading
|
The procedure for manual grading is described in [URL=https://github.com/psi46/MoReWeb/pull/120]https://github.com/psi46/MoReWeb/pull/120[/URL].
In short, inside the test folder it is necessary to place a text file called [I]grade.txt[/I] that contains just one number representing the manual grade:
|
|
Fri Sep 18 15:45:21 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Other, M2211 and M2122
|
I made a mistake and instead M2122 used ID M2211 in the .ini file.
Hence now we do not have entry for M2122 but have 2 entries for M2211: one is of Sept 18 and another one called old of Sep 17).
Test results of Sep 17 are for 2211
|
|
Mon May 4 15:28:14 2020, Andrey Starodumov, General, M1660
|
M1660 is taken from gel-pak and cabled for retest.
This module was graded C only at second FT at-20C, the first FT at -20C and FT at +10C give grade B. Massive trimming failure of pixels in ROC7 was not
observed.
|
|
Fri Apr 3 17:39:19 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Module doctor, M1654
|
After a protection cap glued to M1654, I observed a few strongly bent wire bonds and probably some shorts on ROC8. One (VD+) of them is even detached (on
HDI side). Pads from 25/26 till 35 are affected.
Nevertheless the Reception test gave the same results as before the cap gluing: grade A.
|
|
Fri Apr 3 13:55:48 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, M1653 failed Reception
|
Roc12-15 are not programmable.
Visual inspection is Ok, nothing found.
To module doctor! |
|
Thu Apr 2 17:06:19 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, M1652 failed Reception
|
ROC1 of M1652 is not programmable.
Put in the "Bad" tray as C module. |
|
Wed Apr 1 14:36:37 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, M1646 failed Reception
|
M1646 showed Idig=1A, ROC6 is not programmable.
Visual inspection: scratch on a periphery (between bonding pads) of ROC6.
To module doctor! |
|
Tue Mar 31 10:32:32 2020, Urs Langenegger, Full test, M1637
|
Maybe M1637 has an issue: It got stuck twice at the same place with
[09:53:16.043] <TB0> INFO: PixTestReadback::CalibrateIa()
|
|
Fri Mar 27 17:27:09 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, M1635 failed Reception
|
All ROCs are programmable but DESER400 trailer error bits: "NO DATA" or "IDLE DATA".
ROC8-11 are affected (no data)
Visual inspection is OK
|
|
Thu Apr 30 15:38:43 2020, danek kotlinski, Module transfer, M1635 & M1671 transferred to gel-pack
|
| Two bad modules have been placed in gel-packs: 1635 & 1671. |
|
Fri Mar 27 14:28:14 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, M1633 failed Reception
|
All ROCs are programmable but permanent DESERALISER ERROR, Ch6 and Ch7 event ID mismatch.
Visual inspection is OK
To module doctor |
|
Tue Apr 14 16:54:31 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Other, M1633 cable disconnected
|
We do not have any more module holders.
M1633 was in "Module doctor" tray.
I took module off the holder and put it in a gel-pak. |
|
Fri May 29 13:56:35 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Re-grading, M1630
|
In ROC1 of M1630 gain calibration failed massively (3883 pixels) at +10C with CtrlReg 9.
A special test of M1630 only at +10C and with CtrlReg 17 showed no problem.
p10_1 from ~/L1_DATA/ExtraTests_ToBeKept/M1630_FullTestp10_2020-04-17_15h54m_1587131688/000_Fulltest_p10
|
|
Tue Mar 24 16:08:58 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, M1625 failed Reception
|
M1625: all ROCs are programmable but no readout from ROC0-ROC3.
The same symptom as for M1623.
Visual inspection is OK.
|
|
Tue Mar 24 15:20:18 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, M1623 failed Reception
|
M1623: all ROCs are programmable but no readout from ROC0-ROC3.
Visual inspection is OK.
To module doctor. |
|
Tue Mar 24 15:18:59 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, M1621 failed Reception
|
| On M1621 ROC8 is not programmable. |