 Tue Mar 31 18:14:47 2020, Andrey Starodumov, HDI test, 3 HDI tested
|
| HDIs: 1027, 5002, 5003 are tested. All OK. |
|
Tue Mar 31 09:29:02 2020, Urs Langenegger, Full test, exchanged adapter for DTB_WXC03A
|
I did not manage to get any r/o from the module connected to that adapter, also after exchanging the module.
So I exchanged the module adapter with the one from the blue box, and all issues with r/o were gone (with both modules)
|
 Tue Mar 31 17:36:36 2020, Urs Langenegger, Full test, exchanged adapter for DTB_WXC03A
|
[quote="Urs Langenegger"]I did not manage to get any r/o from the module connected to that adapter, also after exchanging the module.
So I exchanged the module adapter with the one from the blue box, and all issues with r/o were gone (with both modules)
|
|
Tue Mar 31 17:32:47 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, RT of M1641-M1644
|
| All modules graded A. |
|
Tue Mar 31 10:32:32 2020, Urs Langenegger, Full test, M1637
|
Maybe M1637 has an issue: It got stuck twice at the same place with
[09:53:16.043] <TB0> INFO: PixTestReadback::CalibrateIa()
|
|
Tue Mar 31 08:21:39 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of 1558, 1606, 1634, 1636 on Mar 30
|
M1558: B
M1606: C again due to trimmed threshold for 189 pixels of ROC2 at -20C. Second time at -20C and at +10C the number of failed pixels is 90+, hence grading
is B.
|
Tue Mar 31 06:54:12 2020, danek kotlinski, Module grading, M1542 
|
I have tested M1542.
It looks not bad but there is a group of pixels in the lower/left corner of ROC6 which behave different.
One can also see that something is not right in some PH optimisation plots.
|
|
Mon Mar 30 17:49:31 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, RT of M1637-1640
|
All modules: M1637, M1638, M1639, M1649, are graded A.
|
|
Mon Mar 30 17:40:35 2020, Andrey Starodumov, HDI test, 3+2 HDIs (re-)tested
|
For 3 HDIs: 3014, 3017, 6021, HV has been re-measured. In all cases 790V is measured with 800V supplied.
2 HDIs: 1026, 5022 were tested. Both OK.
All 5 HDIs will be used in module assembly. |
|
Mon Mar 30 16:46:59 2020, Andrey Starodumov, DB, Sensors missing in Advacam spreadsheet
|
Dinko noticed that several sensors are missing in Advacam spreadsheet:
- 381785-03-3 used for M1586
- 381783-02-1 used for M1617
|
|
Fri Mar 27 18:29:53 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, FT of M1629, M1630, M1631, M1632
|
M1629: B due to mean noise at -20C
M1630: C due to ROC1 with all pixels failed of PH calibration (Gain). Both FT at -20C are A!
Should be understood and retested. Put in C* tray.
|
|
Mon Mar 30 14:52:59 2020, Danek Kotlinski, Full test, FT of M1629, M1630, M1631, M1632
|
I have tested M1630.
I see not problem with ROC1. See the attached plot.
There is one dcol in ROC12 which shoes the "pattern" problem seen in a few other ROCs.
|
|
Mon Mar 30 15:40:52 2020, Urs, Full test, FT of M1629, M1630, M1631, M1632
|
M1630 is interesting because (I am using my terminology in the following) for the test at T=+10C ROC1 fails the PH optimization test and by consequence
the gain/pedestal test is also failed.
|
|
Sun Mar 29 18:14:59 2020, danek kotlinski, Other, Modules 1544 & 1563 in gelpack
|
The 2 bad modules:
M1544
M1563
|
|
Fri Mar 27 18:28:34 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Full test, 4 HDIs tested
|
| HDIs 5020, 5018, 1044 and 1041 are OK |
|
Fri Mar 27 17:27:09 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, M1635 failed Reception
|
All ROCs are programmable but DESER400 trailer error bits: "NO DATA" or "IDLE DATA".
ROC8-11 are affected (no data)
Visual inspection is OK
|
|
Fri Mar 27 14:46:04 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Module doctor, Wolfram's summay from Mar 25
|
M1542 nothing on sdata3 (12-15), bad output or wire-bond
M1544 ROC15 timing off, can be made to work (roc 15 vdig 11, ..), but probably not usable for the detector
M1545 full readout, ok, upgraded to C*
|
|
Fri Mar 27 16:41:16 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Module doctor, Wolfram's summay from Mar 25
|
[quote="Andrey Starodumov"]M1542 nothing on sdata3 (12-15), bad output or wire-bond
M1544 ROC15 timing off, can be made to work (roc 15 vdig 11, ..), but probably not usable for the detector
M1545 full readout, ok, upgraded to C*
|
|
Fri Mar 27 14:32:11 2020, Andrey Starodumov, HDI test, List of suspicious HDIs
|
Here are HDIs that the first time tested showed 500-600V measured on the pin or directly on the HDI pad instead of 800V:
5006, 5007, 2005
3014, 3017, 3019, 6021
|
|
Fri Mar 27 14:28:14 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, M1633 failed Reception
|
All ROCs are programmable but permanent DESERALISER ERROR, Ch6 and Ch7 event ID mismatch.
Visual inspection is OK
To module doctor |
|
Fri Mar 27 10:54:04 2020, Urs Langenegger, Full test, Issues with pc11366 on March 27
|
On March 27 I had a lot of troubles getting the full qualification up
and running.
|
|
Thu Mar 26 17:43:06 2020, Andrey Starodumov, HDI test, 6+1 HDI tested
|
HDIs: 6021, 3014, 2005, 2009, 2006 and 2010 are OK
HDI 6024 failed: SDA0 and SDA2 on Ch1 missing
|
|
Thu Mar 26 17:41:52 2020, Andrey Starodumov, Reception test, RT of M1629-1632
|
| All modules M1629, M1630, M1631 and M1632 graded A |
|
Thu Mar 26 10:41:24 2020, danek kotlinski, Module grading, M1606
|
I have looked more closely at M1606.
Trimming show problems in ROC2, 8 pixels have 0 threshold and for 61 pixels thr=-1.
Strange because from Scurves the 61 have a high ~62 threshold but no failure.
|
|
Thu Mar 26 15:37:18 2020, Urs, Module grading, M1606
|
| attached find the threshold difference distributions for all four trimbits for all ROCs |